Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts

Reflections-2014 Season



Pretty much how I feel about this season...


Well, the playoffs have escaped us, and what started out as the makings of a good season...
...have spiraled to an out-of-control whirlwind ride that has myself and the coaching staff wondering, basically "What the hell just happened?".  It was one of those seasons, high hopes, fair amount of returners coming back, some good looking, fresh new faces, and then BAM!, the injury bug hit.  Couple that with suspensions, and some crazy off the field stuff, and what looked bright and sunny, immediately clouded over and rained...then poured.  Anyhow, the beautiful thing about the game of football is that it's a teacher, sometimes a cold-blooded teacher, but nonetheless an educator.  Seasons like this are good to reflect on once the agony of defeat and dismay have evaporated into the cool fall air.  I'd like to share with you several things I've learned, and plan to either discontinue doing, or build upon for the future.  Hopefully posts like this will keep you from making a similar mistake, or maybe you can find something that I did that will help your team.  If anything, this post may help me from drinking an entire bottle of Jack Daniels, as you all know, writing is how I relax.

Get Rid of Cancers Early
I'll start with a negative here.  We had some this season, and boy did they inflict some mental damage, early, and often.  Our head man gave them way too many chances in my opinion, but hey, when you're just a passenger aboard the ship, you don't always have a hand in it's course.  We had two guys who really, for lack of a better word were horses-asses.  The kids, no doubt were our best athletes, and worst citizens.  They were a constant black mark on the program from the spring practices on.  It was actually a relief once they were finally removed from the team, but damage from guys like that cuts deep, and can easily divide a team that may have had shaky leadership from the jump.  I really saw us get separated by this issue, and I hope in the future that the head coach takes this into account, as I'm sure these guys will return next season as both were underclassmen.  I think had we removed these guys early in the season, some of things we faced as a team would've been a bit easier to handle.  Hostilities would've remained low and focus would've been more crisp.  Again, just my opinion, but if you have a bad attitude, quite frankly you cannot play for me.  I just don't have time for bad attitudes.  Maybe it's a short-coming in my ability to coach, but I'm getting old enough now, quite frankly, I don't give a rats ass.  Show up, work to get better and love every minute you're in that uniform, and you'll play for me.  I'll find a place for you.



Potential is the Worst Word a Football Coach can use
We've all done it.  We've all said it.  "Man that guy's got the potential to be a real star".  Thoughts like these, kill a coach, and blind him in his ability to fairly evaluate a player.  Potential will also keep a coach hanging on to a player who isn't "fitting the bill" because the player should be able to perform better than he really is.  Case in point, I had a safety, that if I ranked them on potential, was hands down number one.  Best athlete of all the safeties, and probably second or third best in the entire secondary.  Kid wouldn't do it.  He just couldn't grasp some of the things he was asked to do at DB, and then when it came down to "nut-cutting time" he just went in a shell.  Now, we worked with him (he's just a sophomore) and he came around, but never did he live up to his "hype".  I think eventually he will be a real player, but had we played him just based on "potential", things might have been real bad in the back end of our defense.

The face of "potential"

My MLB from the start of the season, had tremendous "potential" (see there's that word again), but could not handle being the "center of attention" in the defense.  This young man would've been better as an OLB or DE where he wasn't the "man in the middle".  However, based on potential and things I was seeing in practice he started four games before finally quitting due to frustration.  I blame myself on that one, because later on the kid simply said he didn't like making the calls and the strength calls because it put him as the center of attention.  This is the type of kid that only wears gray shirts so he doesn't stand out in a crowd.  Don't get me wrong, he'll rip your damn head off in LB drills, or in a team session.  When asked to bark out checks or signals, he quickly got frustrated and went into a shell, began to play worse, and then got frustrated.  The worse he played, the more frustrated he got.  That one's on me for not nailing down the problem from the get-go, and not evaluating the young man on his game day performance.  Great kid, and more than likely will be back next season (he too was a sophomore), but, we lost an entire season that he could have been developing and getting better.  Had I stepped back and realized the young man's struggle as well as talking to him before he quit, I could have addressed the problem and made some adjustments.  Lesson learned.

My Defensive Plan was as Solid as it has Ever Been
I have to toot my own horn here.  I haven't felt this good about my defense in quite some time.  Now I'm not talking about players, I'm talking about scheme.  I've gone back to my roots and am running the 4-3, albeit a bastardized version of the 4-2-5 at times.  I have stolen all my line movements from TCU, fronts and coverages from Michigan State and coupled them with some long-time blitzes I've had and borrowed from many many seasons at the helm of the defense.  What it amounted to, was being the unit on the field that kept us in every game we were in.  The unfortunate fact is that we had zero offense and eventually succumbed to our opponents, but I received numerous compliments on the defensive play.  I really took this off season to package things and couple things together in a manner that made sense to the kids, was easy to teach, and each step further into the defensive teaching built on the last.  Like I said, I'm patting myself on the back here for this one, because my efforts paid off.  I've literally never blitzed or stunted as much as I did this season.  Just a ballpark figure of some games I've already got data on, we blitzed roughly 70 percent of the time, and had at least some sort of defensive movement (stunt, blitz or both) on over 85% of our defensive snaps.  That's just a 3 game sample I took from the beginning, middle and end of our season today on Hudl.  I ran the 4-3 like many coaches run a 3-3.  The idea though was to blitz or stunt with a purpose, and put our players in a position to make a play.  We had a lot of young guys on defense, even though there are several seniors, they were backups last season, so they had very little playing experience.  They struggled reading and making the base reads, so we needed an answer and stunting and blitzing was it.  We also did not live and die by the blitz like many folks think you have to.  We gave up our share of big plays, but I'd be willing to bet we gave up as many big plays in base defense as we did when we blitzed, percentage-wise of course.

My favorite blitz from this season


Schematically we were your typical 4-3 Over front.  I did not run any Under front this season as I did not have that "Sam" backer you need to manhandle a TE, and we rarely saw any 2 back sets.  We played a few front variations and did run a front that had the Sam LB on the LOS, but pretty much when you saw us, we were the good ol' Over front.

One thing I did that really helped keep teaching and confusion down, is what TCU calls "fist".  For me, it meant that in base defense (no blitz called), the Sam LB (my most athletic of the 3, and the best "cover guy" of the 3) went to passing strength, while the Will (usually my best tackler) went to the weak side of the coverage.  The front, and the MLB aligned based on whatever we so chose to do.  I was able to set my front by tight (to the 3 man surface), split (away from the 3 man surface), field, boundary, to (to the offset back) or away (away from the offset back).  This made us very multiple, yet allowed us to keep things simple.  The fist adjustment, used only vs 1 back teams, kept the teaching simple as well, most notably when running Solo coverage.  Since the LB away from pass strength in Solo has the RB man to man, the fist adjustment allowed this to be the same guy every time.  So if we were setting the strength to the offset RB vs. a 1 back gun team, then we would actually have the Will LB and the three technique set to the same side vs. a trips open look.  I know what many are thinking, but if you two gap your ends, there are absolutely no bubbles.  Surprisingly enough, we did not do ANY TGOG?!  I was shocked, but then when I looked back, what made this happen was the ability we had in our secondary.  When we faced teams that were what I call "Spread to Run", we simple adjusted the secondary to play Bronco Coverage.  To remind folks, Bronco is just a Quarters adjustment (some folks call this coverage "Combo") where the corner is MEG (man everywhere he goes) and the safety has the number two receiver vertical or out.  I usually press the corners, but it can also be played from off.  The safeties tighten down from 10 yards deep to about six, depending on the situation.  Anyhow, I'm rambling, what this does is allow you to keep seven in the box.  That makes it tough to run against.  It also keeps those OLB's inside the tackle box against 2x2 and 3x1 looks that usually require the removing of a LB from the box.  This allows you to defend all the offense is doing with seven dedicated run defenders.  Obviously, if you don't have the guys on the outside to match up, this isn't the answer, and TGOG would be a much better answer.

Fist vs. 3x1


I'm going to delve into my blitz scheme as things go further along with the off season, however I do want to leave you with a "teaser".  We literally taught our MLB 1 blitz, and our OLB's 3 blitzes, and were able to run 17 different blitz calls.  Add this along with our stunts (almost verbatim to what TCU runs), and you've got what looks like a vast playbook, but is really the simple teaching of just a few concepts.  Once packaged together we became quite a force, and as mentioned, really kept our team in several games.  Like I said, I plan on doing some posts on this, because I really took the time this off season to develop and "nail down" my scheme into some simple, easy-to-teach concepts to allow us to play faster than we had been.

There were some holes though.  I just posted something on the Huey board about Quarters coverage, as I'm trying to pair down what we do in the back end of our defense.  We played a "zoned" version of Quarters this past season (basically the corner would come off late on the wheel route to help the OLB who was carrying it through the flat).  Our adjustment to quick game and keeping the OLB's closer to the box was to play TCU's Bronco coverage, which worked pretty darn well.  We used three trips adjustments, Solo, MSU"s "Midpoints" with Quarters to the single receiver side, and Midpoints with Cover Two Man to the single receiver side.  We played only a small amount of Cover 3, and tons of Cover 0.  I really want to get this pressed corner back in Quarters look down pat.  I think it would translate well to what we do elsewhere, such as how much Cover 0 we ran, and we pressed when we played Bronco.  I think it would drastically reduce the amount of teaching time we have to give our corners, and let us focus more on the safeties.  I think once I get the back end of the defense shored up I might have a pretty sound scheme on my hands.  I finally feel like when I'm out there I have all the answers to what I'm seeing and what I might see.  That, my friends, is a darn good feeling as a DC.



Being in the Booth Wasn't as Bad as I Thought it Would be
I called all of our games from the box, and let me tell you, it was actually a joy.  I could see things easy, I could see problems as they were developing, and with such a good handle on my scheme and players, it made things very easy to fix.  Some drawbacks were the young guy I used to signal things in messed up some signals early on, and he didn't really care to be doing what he was doing.  Later, he got used to it, and it worked out quite well.  The lack of having me down on the sideline, at times, was an issue.  I couldn't get in their ears and chew on them when they needed it, and I couldn't reassure as well from up in the box, however I did put several players on the headsets to talk to them about things, and it seemed to work just fine.  Another drawback was not being in the middle of what was going on with player rotation and changes sometimes caused some confusion, but not to the point that I felt it was detrimental.  We had some issues as a staff, but I think those issues would have been there whether I was on the field or in the box.

Being able to see things was the greatest advantage.  I made a comment to one of the other coaches when he asked me if I liked being up there, I told him it was like playing a real live game of NCAA football.  He laughed, but in all honesty, that's what it was.  You could see the personnel grouping change, you had your call sheet right in front of you, and it was quite simple to make your calls.  You also didn't have to worry about some slap dick JV coach that wasn't prepared trying to relay information to you, which is a major issue for us because we have such low coaching numbers.  I get wrapped up in the game, and the emotions that run wild on the sidelines, so being up in the booth, kept me cool, calm and collected.  I really hope to continue this trend of being in the box, although on the road there were times when it royally sucked to be on top of the booth rather than inside of it.  What the heck though, you take the good with the bad right?



All Coaches Have Got to be on the Same Page
When I was a head coach, I never felt this was an issue.  Now that I'm an assistant, no words could ever be spoken truer.  Tough seasons, like this year, really bring out the best and worst in some individuals.  Coaches are no exception.  We had some issues this season, that really didn't lead to our demise, but they darn sure didn't help it either.  If I ever go back to being a head coach (highly unlikely), I plan on making sure that the Indians know who the chief is, and know exactly what he wants done, and how he wants it done.

We had some issues with some assistant coaches, who made adjustments down on the field without letting me know.  This kind of crap really bothers me.  What bothers me even more is the fact that on some occasions, the coaches were telling the kids to do something from the week, or even several weeks before.  One instance comes to mind was we were playing a seven technique when we got a TE from one opponent this year, well our base rule is to play a nine.  I felt a seven would help us defend what our opponent was trying to do when they ran with a TE (they only did this maybe 30 percent of the time).  Anyhow, I noticed several times we were in a nine technique on runs that gutted us, only to find out our DE coach had told the kid to play a nine.  Confronting the coach in meetings yielded the fact I hated to hear, and that was, "Well, a nine technique is what we always line up in against a TE?!".  Yes, but if you'd read the scouting report and game plan you'd have seen our adjustment based on what we were going to face.  Anyhow, I'm beginning to ramble and my blood beginning to boil.  You cannot ask your players to be on the same page if the coaches aren't, and in my opinion, this lack of control on the "upper end" of a football program, leads to bigger issues down the line.  I'm certainly hoping we can get this corrected, as I know I don't plan on dealing with it any more.



Have Fun
I took the mentality this season, that no matter the results, no matter the outcome, I was going to make it a point to have fun.  For the most, part, I stuck true to this axiom.  I had my moments, especially late in the season, but for the most part I did have fun.  The interaction with the kids is what I focused on the most.  I've never done this, so for me this was a big step.  The players have always been super important to me, however I've always been known as a scheme coach, a grinder, a worker bee of sorts.  I've never been one to be labeled "fun" or "loosey-goosey".  This season I made it a point to step back at times, and just let loose, joking with players, or simply just chatting with a young man about something other than football.  I think it made me closer with them, allowed me to bond with some guys I might not otherwise have done had I had my nose stuck against a computer screen all season long.  It really gave me great insight to what our players were experiencing off the field.  This is something I would have never done in the past, as it took away from game prep.  Being looser, and choosing to open up and have some fun with the players, I think has allowed me to become a better coach.  I have a greater understanding of what our guys are thinking, and what some of them are going through once they leave the practice field.  There is absolutely nothing wrong with doing something that gives you greater insight into your players lives.  After all, the game of football is only a short time in their lives, the lessons learned are what last a lifetime.  Us as coaches, only get a short time to make an impact on these lives, so we need to cherish every moment we get to do that, and I really feel I took a major step forward in this area of my coaching.



You are Only as Good as Your Last Man
I had a coach tell me this one time, and I never knew what he meant.  Well after the injuries we had this season, I know exactly what he meant.  When the race was over, there were only five guys on our defense that were there at the beginning.  One of these was a cancer that was removed from the team, two others were removed for rule violations (can't speak of them here, but guys close to me know what we went through, and it was pretty crazy to say the least).  The rest were not just injuries, but season-ending injuries.  In all, we had a team total of seven season ending injuries, all to starters.  Add that along with eight players (five of which were starters) who were removed from the team or quit, and that spells disaster.  By the end of the season the starting lineups were as follows:

  1. NG, and both DE's finished season, DT did not
  2. MLB only LB to make it through the season
  3. FS only DB to make it through the season
The offense may have been hit worse.  All five of the OL were gone, for one reason or the other by the end of the season.  In our last game we started three guys that played junior varsity at the start of the year.  We ended the season with four wide receivers, and one tailback.  I'm not sure I've EVER been a part of something like this, but it absolutely got to where you dreaded Mondays, because of either getting hit with bad news from the doctor, or bad news from the administration.

Yep!


I try to find the silver lining in all of this, and what it boils down to is that we actually ended up with a decent secondary, most of which will be back next season.  We ended up using some rotation guys to fill some holes, and I think we also found a guy that's going to be a pretty good DE, once we get him headed in the right direction.  Other than that though, there is no silver lining.  Getting guys ready to play is always a week in and week out issue, however it seemed like we were patching things together EVERY week, especially after about week four or five.  So, when you think you've got it bad, just take your finger and scroll down your depth chart to the bottom.  If you've still got guys ahead of your worst players in every position, you're still doing good.  When those guys are starting, the whiskey can't flow fast enough!!!



No Matter How Bad it Gets, Keep Working
Steve Spurrier used to always comment "Just keep playing guys", and what he's basically saying is that if you quit, you never know what the outcome could've been.  When you quit, you will know EXACTLY what the outcome will be and it'll be that you lose!  As I've written before, Spurrier is a guy I've idolized my entire coaching career, and his words are so true.  I remember years ago, when he was at Florida, he lost a tough game (I think it may have been the Tennessee game which turned out to be his last game in The Swamp), but when asked what happened in the game, we simply replied "We ran out of time".  What I'm beating around the bush on here is, as a coach, you set the direction of your unit, or team.  When things go bad, and you quit printing scouting reports, or you quit doing EDD's, or whatever it is that bad coaches do in bad seasons, you set a precedent for your players to quit too.  I rolled my sleeves up every weekend and broke down film, did scouting reports etc. only to have a coaching staff  "slough off" when the writing was on the wall, so to speak (It wasn't all of them, but there were a lot of guys on our staff that threw the towel in pretty early). This pains me to no end as a coach, because I know as a player, I'd want my coaches doing everything they could to help us get a win.  What bothers me even more, is how can you let the kids down like that?  I overheard one coach stating the the kids had quit, once they knew we weren't going to be in the playoffs.  I had felt a bit of this too, however I think it's in every athlete's nature to want to compete to win, so I don't buy in to that kind of talk.  What had happened is a majority of the coaching staff had quit once the grim realization had set in that we were not going to the playoffs.  Kids can sense this kinda stuff, and are good at identifying it.  They don't want to be at practice anymore than they have to, so when you, as a coach, show up and aren't doing the same things you were doing in week one of the season, shame on you.  I had one of my LB's ask me "Coach, why are we still doing block destruction drills?".  This was in the second-to-the last week of the season, to which I let him know, because we had so many young guys struggling at getting off blocks when I watched film.  To that young man, what we were doing was pointless, and he even stated as much, saying that since the playoffs weren't attainable, there was no reason to get better.  Well, I had to stop the drill, as to me, there's always room for improvement.  I told the young man, that the contrary was really the case for us.  We were so bad, that the only way to go from where we were was up, but that we couldn't improve if we didn't keep working.  He shrugged it off, but after practice he came back over to me and told me he had thought about our conversation, and he knew I was right.  He also thanked me for never giving up.  He was one of our seniors too, not necessarily a leader, but easily a guy the younger ones looked up to.  The problem was, this type of leadership was only being done by a few coaches.  That is the sad part about all of it.  If you ever get that feeling, you've got to do whatever it takes to push on.  In all reality, it is your duty to do so.  We are all going to have tough seasons, or rough patches we go through, just realize the young men you are coaching are not only looking up to you during the good times, they are watching in the bad times too.

What Does the Future Hold?

Great Scott, where has the time gone?!

I wish I knew!  There is a part of me that desperately wants to stay on here and get things turned around and corrected, but there's also a part of me that knows, our administration is going to put a monkey wrench into our rebuilding plans.  I'm also uncomfortable with some of the guys I coach with, and this is never a good thing.  We have some guys on staff I don't feel I can trust, and others I just plain don't get along with.  Now, I don't let my work suffer for it, nor do I allow differences to bleed over onto the practice or game fields.  However, it's not easy coaching with guys that you feel you have to look over your back to make sure they aren't putting a knife into it.  I'm hoping our head coach is making some staff changes in the off season that will be worth our while, but if not, I may try to get in somewhere else.  I don't have many options, but I could also take some time off, as I haven't taken a season off since I started coaching back in 1997.  But, with that being said, I sure like the way my side of the ball was handled this past season, and I think there are some positives to build on, but a lot of what goes on here has to run through some pretty political filters, so we'll just have to see what happens.

Maybe politics ain't so bad...
Good news for the readers is that I'm back to blogging.  If you read a tweet I made earlier (you can follow me on Twitter @FballIsLifeBlog), I have given up on writing my book on the Flexbone offense.  I've never been one for charging folks for stuff, and I think with what little money coaches make, that money should go to their families instead of other coaches pockets.  Well, you guys are going to get the book for free.  If you are a defensive coach, you're going to have to wait for a while because there are going to be SEVERAL posts dealing with the Flexbone and the triple option coming up.  I'll keep you defensive guys satisfied though as we roll on, and I'll get my blitz post out before spring ball opens up.  

For those of you that have the luxury of making the playoffs, DO NOT take a minute of it for granted.  Savor the moment, relish it, and realize just how special it is.  Good luck in the second season and go get that ring!!!



Duece

So You Want to Be the Head Ball Coach???



There's more to this than you think!

This is the time of year when coaching jobs are opening up daily, and younger coaches are putting together their resumes and getting their interviewing skills polished up.  I think many, if not all young coaches aspire to one day be the head coach of their own team, and rightfully so, that's how our American society works.  We are taught from a very young age to attain the highest level of achievement possible, so wanting to be the "boss" is not a bad thing by any means.  However, what I think a lot of folks miss, is what is it, exactly that the head football coach does?  I'm going to go through some of my experiences, and then give my opinion on where I'm at in my career and what my direction is going to be.  Hopefully this will steer some of you in your decision as those jobs keep popping up on your state association's websites.

What Does it Mean to be Head Coach?
You need to sit down and ask yourself, what this means.  I used to think it meant I got to run my stuff, how I wanted it, when I wanted it, and if somebody didn't like it they could pound sand!  Well, nothing could be farther from the truth.  Being the head coach means entirely different things at different places.  Of the hundred or so guys I played college and high school football with, I know of nine that are currently head coaches.  Every one of their programs is different, and some quite glaringly different.  This is the top factor to keep in mind when selecting a job to interview for, in my opinion.  You need to ask yourself, and the school where you are interviewing, "What is the job description for the head football coach?".  You might be quite shocked that folks have no clue as to what the job description for a high school football head coach is.  Mainly they want you to win, period, and some places may have a clearly defined set of parameters that they want the head coach to live up to, which is much better than working for folks who have no clue what they want other than a "winner". 




Again, what does it mean to be the head football coach at a high school, or anywhere for that matter.  I think the number one thing young candidates forget is the scrutiny in which you will be judged.  Remember, all the good things that happen are because of you and the bad things are because of you.  It does not matter that little Timmy can't bench press 100 pounds and is your starting tight end, or that you have three FBS running backs in your backfield, everything will revolve around YOU.  This comes as a shock to many new coaches, and some simply can't hack it.  Society has deemed the job this way, you either get used to it and evolve with it, or you will certainly get tossed by the wayside when you can't cope. 

I will give you an example.  I have a buddy, who took over a decent program a few years ago, they had won a state championship in school history and they had been to the playoffs a few years before falling on down times and firing their third year coach (whose best record at the time was 5-5).  In comes the new coach, right about the time that a crop of talented young freshmen were making their way on campus, having won two Pop Warner regional championships and one Pop Warner state championship, these guys were loaded.  A lot of these players started as freshmen and sophomores as my buddy had a little "house cleaning" to do when he got there.  Anyhow, long story short, they played for the state championship two years ago and lost by one point.  They did with 7 kids that were signed to FBS scholarships, 7 kids who went to FCS teams, 2 that played Division II ball, and 5 that went Division III or NAIA.  The next season, when the cupboard was bare, this team that was 11-3 the year before, went 5-5 and didn't even make the playoffs.  The following season they went 6-4, but also missed the playoffs, and my buddy is now no longer coaching there.  The reason, he didn't run a successful program.  Was he a good coach?  I think he his, hell I coached three years with him, and I thought he was a fine coach, but what do I know?  Did he win with just talent?  Maybe so, but talent is part of the picture when it comes to winning.  I have always defined success as when coaching meets talent.  A lack of either, and you can kiss success goodbye.



So remember, just because you think that being the head coach is the "dream job" you will be viewed under a microscope when it comes to EVERY decision you make.  These are things, as an assistant coach, you don't always see on Friday nights.  Every eye is on your decisions, and the outcomes, without having any inkling of what goes into preparing a bunch of young men to play the game in a week's time. 

You are also going to find that being the head football coach, in some places, has little to do with actual football.  In the grand scheme of things, football will be less than half what you have to do at some places.  I have been involved in programs where the head coach had to do all or some of the things listed below:
  • Fundraising- this might seem trivial, but I actually worked at a place where the football staff did no fundraising whatsoever.
  • Field Painting- yep, everywhere I've been the coaches have painted the field.  I have friends who look at me like I have an arm growing out of my ass when I say this, but that's just how it is.
  • Field Maintenance- Yep, you better believe it, be careful where you apply if you don't want to get those hands dirty!
  • Practice setup- I have seen this done different everywhere I've been.  The best place, was where I worked as a DC for the first time, the coaches did nothing when it came to field setup for practice.  We showed up, coached and left...why did I leave????
  • Strength and Conditioning- this too has been a 50-50 split where I've been.  Some programs have had S&C coaches on staff, while others did not.  Not a big deal, but it can be a further time suck.
  • Booster- I worked one place that the requirement was for the head football coach to be a member of the booster club as well as attend all meetings that were held so long as you were not in season.  My last gig as an assistant coach, the guy I worked for didnt' even know the names of the boosters!  Again, this differs everywhere, and I prefer a happy medium of the two situations I listed.


Some other things, that aren't necessarily school enforced are listed below:
  • Manager- that's right, you have to be the macro-manager of the entire ship.  You will be not only managing players, but assistant coaches as well.  Some guys don't see this, as they only see the X's and O's, but you are ultimately responsible for the daily managing of a football program, whose number could easily exceed 100 players, staff and personnel. 
  • Counselor- yep, you bet your sweet ass!  I have had to counsel many a young man when it comes to problems, most not having a single thing to do with the gridiron.  Some coaches don't think about this, and it becomes a drag on the job, but in all honesty I enjoyed helping young people, so it didn't bother me.
  • Coordinator- at both my head coaching stints, I was also a coordinator.  My first high school job I worked under a guy that was nothing more than a "figure head" coach.  Most schools don't have the money to spend on coaches, so having to coordinate is something you may have to do.  At the very least you might have to be a position coach, which isn't bad, but most coaches I know do have some sort of role as a coordinator on their team.  I even had a friend who was not only the head coach, but was also the offensive AND defensive coordinator where he worked.  Needless to say he was run ragged by the end of each season he coached there.
  • Parent- whether you like it or not, to a lot of the players you coach, you will be more of a father figure than they've ever had in their life.  Not many books on coaching spell this out, but it is an ever-growing part of the job that we must realize, and it does take time away from the actual "football" that you could be doing.  This part of the job can also put a lot of stress on you as a coach, so be warned!
  • Banker-most places I've been the coaching staff didn't manage there money, however in some places you will have full control over your account and your budget.  If you are not good at accounting, better find a staff member that is.  Also, if you are not good at budgeting, time to start getting better, especially since in most programs you need to get the most out of the dollar you possibly can!
  • Problem Solver-this is a big one, because everyone will be looking for you to put out the daily fires within the program.  You need to be quick with this one, as untreated problems within, or game time problems need quick thinking and action in order to solve them.  In one way or another, you will solve several problems throughout the course of a single football season, can you handle that?
I'm sure there's more that I'm missing, but these are basically the "highlights" of what can be asked of a head coach either directly or indirectly. 



Some Questions to ask About the Job You are Interviewing
  1. What happened to the previous head coach?  Was he fired?  If so what for?  Did he resign?  If so, why?  Sometimes these answers aren't obvious, but if you can get your hands on the previous head coach, you need to pick his brain.  See why he left, evaluate his reasons and determine if this is still the job for you.  Nothing says that you have to take the job, and it's still wise to interview, but you need to keep some of this stuff in mind during the application process.
  2. What is the current staff like?  Are they staying or leaving?  Will they be loyal if you are hired?  Are any of them also interviewing?  Some of this you'll have to find out for yourself after the hire.  You can get a good judge though if you can meet the current staff.  Most high schools don't get rid of entire staff's (though I was a part of a major purging here recently), so you should be able to contact them.  If one is interviewing for the job, just realize he's at an advantage over you in that he's known, however he can become a bigger problem for you if you get the job.
  3. What is the administration like?  Are the open and receptive to your ideas, or do they already have an idea of what they want to do with the football program?  How long has the current administration been at the school?  These are serious questions, because the administration is your boss, and you need to know who's running the ship.  Do they seem knowledgeable about football?  If they are is it to the point they would be meddling?  If they are not, are they open to learning about the game and it's impact on the school?  How is the A.D.?  Is the A.D. a "football guy", or is he involved mainly with some other sport?
  4. How is the booster club set up and what influence do they have on the hire?  I have been at only one place where the booster club was present at the interview.  This place was terrible, because the boosters basically ran the school, and the football program.  If things weren't done to their liking you got a visit from them, and no head coach has lasted very long at that school.  You need good boosters, but not meddling ones.  Most are meddlesome, however some to the point of being annoying, yet you can get involved with some that are power hungry like I've been involved with.  The power hungry booster club is a recipe for disaster, I highly recommend avoiding them at all costs.
  5. What is your budget?  Where does this money come from and how is it used?  I worked at a program that the baseball team kept the money for parking simply because they worked the gate.  THE BASEBALL TEAM!!!!  You got it, and yep, that football program wasn't very good either.  I also coached at a place where we kept the parking money and used it for charter buses to away games.  Nothing better than rolling up in a nice air-conditioned charter bus than the ol' yellow bird anyday.  You need to think about this one seriously because you need money to run a program, and to keep things nice and new to attract players. 
  6. How supportive is the community?  This is a big one.  Not only do you need an administration that is supportive, but you will need to have not only parents on board, but local businesses as well.  Most, if not all, good programs, have tremendous support for their local high school athletics, so check this out before interviewing. 
  7. What are the facilities like?  Are they in good shape and well kept, or in need of repair and revamping?  If they need to be revamped, is the A.D. and administration open to spending money to get the school's facilities on par with that of your competition?  What is the field like?  Is the football field in good shape?  Who maintains the football field?  You need to know this, because the answer to a lot these questions might be you!  You also need the freedom to keep up with your competition, especially in today's "instant gratification" society.  Kids want to go where it's cool and they can look good.  If you are entering a program that has a 30 year old weight room  and has been using the same jerseys for the past ten seasons, I would LOOK OUT!
  8. How has the program been doing both recently and in the past?  Has this program ever been to the playoffs?  Has this program ever won any sort of championship (district, region or state)?  In the words of a former mentor, "Don't go where you can't win".  This is very important, as I know we all want to leave our mark and our legacy turning around that downtrodden team, but believe me, all you are doing is shaving years off your life with the stress you'll ultimately inherit.  Take a long look at the school's history and how things have been in the past.  Why are they this way?  If you can't put your finger on a solution, I suggest avoiding that job altogether.


So I've Got the Job in Mind I Want, Now What Should I Do?
The number one thing I would tell any young coach, is to have a plan.  I would have a three, five and ten year plan developed based on the questions you've asked, as well as the research you've done.  Be very detailed in your plan, describe how you plan on achieving your goals for the program.  Described any changes you would make, and be very descriptive about these changes.  Make your plan liquid though and adaptable, you never know what you might be up against. Sure a part of your plan is to be a state champion, but who's isn't?  Also, how attainable of a goal is that really?  Looking at an example of mine, I worked for a guy at a private high school, that was doing well why I was with my friend, enrollment was at it's highest, as was sport participation.  Things were going good until the recent economic decline, then numbers began to dwindle, as did the facilities because the school was not generating the revenue to keep the facilities up.  Wins dropped off and the coach was to blame, and ultimately got fired in what is now a six man football program that hasn't won a game in the past two seasons (my friend has not been there for five years now, and I've not been there for over ten).  One of the parts of my friend's plan was that the team would be competitive and win championships, which he did in his first six seasons at the school, however once the talent level decreased and numbers dropped, so did the record.  His plan wasn't "fluid" enough to cover the bad times.  We know as a coach, we are all going to experience these bad times, you need to have this built in to your plan, and what the football program will look like, and be trying to do during these times. 



In reality, winning should NEVER be a part of your plan, and I know this sounds stupid, but when you have to "run what you brung" in high school football, you need to be careful with stating winning as your ultimate goal.  This is why I refer to the movie Facing the Giantsbecause in this movie, the team's goal is altered and they actually start winning.  Now I know, that's fairy-tale bullshit to most of you, but if all you coach for is wins, you are a very hollow person.  I coach, for the betterment of the young men I coach.  I want them to be better fathers, husbands, and members of society, so that this great country can prosper.  That is actually in my mission statement for every program I've ever interviewed for.  I don't coach to win, winning is secondary to our ultimate goal of making better men out of our players.  I think that is what every football coach's mission statement should say, but what the hell, I'm biased!



When you present your plan, be ready for questions.  Actually, you should prepare to be questioned.  You have to realize that Columbus was probably seriously questioned when he set sail for the New World...so will you.  Your plan may be new or foreign, many folks may even use the age old axiom "That can't be done here".  Don't let them sway you, stay true to your plan and your goals for the program when presenting the material.  Answer the interviewers honestly, and if you don't know, simply tell them, I do not know the answer at this time, but if that situation every arises, I will figure out a solution to the problem.

Whatever your plan is, it should be about the program and the players, and how the program will benefit the players and the school.  The administrators want to hear how you are going to bring school pride into the school, how you are going to help handle some of the more "troubled" kids by using football as a tool to reach these young men.  This is where you need to understand that being the head coach is so much more than just football.  I don't think many guys figure this out until it's too late, and unfortunately I was one of those guys.



My future
I don't know that I will ever head coach again, to be honest, it's not been fun for me.  I don't like the daily grind of things that aren't football, yet I completely enjoy the daily grind of football.  I really enjoy being a coordinator, however, after being an interim head coach last year, and the guy I'm working for retiring here soon, I'm sure the opportunity will arise for me to take over the head coaching role at the school I'm currently at.  This will be a big crossroad for me, as I've enjoyed being a coordinator for over five years now, but there is something in all of us that says "I want to be the boss".  We shall see, but the way I feel currently is that I will more than likely turn down the job, and at that point try to get back into high school football.  Anyhow, I hope this was a rewarding piece of information for those that are currently seeking employment as a high school head football coach.  Don't take that title lightly, as there's more to it than most realize!

Duece

Paid to Play? Why This Concept Will Ruin College Football


It's all about the Benjamin's baby...

I recently read an article on this topic at Smart Football (which is a great site, even though I'm completely dissing the idea behind one of the posts over there) and it got me to thinking, where are our morals?  Deep question, I know, remember I have LARGE amounts of free time on my hands here lately, so I do a lot of thinking...probably too much.  Anyhow, I don't see how advocates of a revenue sharing plan for College Football don't see the down side to their ways.  So I wanted to share the other side of the coin, the moral one.  I know this is a touchy subject and I will probably be blasted in the comments section, but you know what...I don't care!  This is my opinion on why College Football players should not be paid to play the game of football.



What really got me burned about this idea was the similarity that the topic has with government spending.  I know, I'm crazy right?!  Anyhow, as most know, I don't teach, I own my own business and part of what I do is site development.  Where I live, there has been a recent influx of public housing.  Being conservative, I'd rather have a hole drilled in my head than do anything with public housing.  However, we all gotta eat right?  Right!  I recently had a conversation with the head investor of one of these projects, and his attitude about public money, blew me away.  He was bitching about the fact that in Florida, Governor Rick Scott is making Welfare recipients comply with random drug tests to comply for the social service.  He was also griping about the Arizona Immigration Laws and how laws like these were taking money out of his pocket because it made it more difficult to find tenants for his low-income housing.  To move ahead in my story, the last comment he left me with was "If the government's willing to give this money away, I might as well get my share."  Where is the morality in this country anymore?  This is what ties in to what I'm trying to get across to you about the paying of amateur athletes in collegiate sports.  This idea that because the universities make so much money on the sports, that the athlete must be entitled to some of it, is ridiculous, and frankly it disgusts me.  Now let me elaborate.



Not one single college athlete has EVER been forced to participate in their sport.  NONE!  I would be willing to bet that all of them knew going in to collegiate athletics meant they were amateur athletes.  However, they DID know that they were getting their education paid for, by the institution they played for as a return for their services so to speak.  One of the most invaluable items we have in this country is a college education, yet we now have college athletes who want a bigger piece of the pie, with the attitude like the investor in the above conversation.  Why is this?  The answer, is easy, as it is one of the seven deadly sins....ENVY.  College athletes envy the money the universities they play for generate.  This is the same premise that liberals claim large corporations are greedy, and that they should give some of their money to the less fortunate.  This idea that it is somehow a crime in this country to make a profit AND KEEP IT has become what many call "greed".  Frankly, it's bullshit.  The institutions have provided a place for this athlete to not only perform, but to get better, as most have state-of-the-art training facilities to go along with some of the top facilities in the nation.  The other item, so often overlooked in this discussion, is the fact that these same "greedy" institutions provide these athletes with some of the land's top facilities in which to get something to which a monetary value need not be applied, and that's a college education.



Envy leads to Wrath

The liberal idea that profit is bad or evil rings ever so true in this argument.  However, look around you, this argument as killed this country we call America.  Between unions, and social programs, the ideas that this country was founded upon, have eroded and drifted away in the breeze.  The car you paid $35,000 for, probably only has around $15,000 in materials in it.  The auto worker's unions have pirated and pillaged the coffers of the auto companies to the point they nearly closed these companies down.  Look in your local newspaper and read every day, some where in this country, some social program is closing, or cutting it's numbers, or government employees are being laid off etc.  The reason, the socialist system does not work is eventually the payer runs out of money due to the greed of the payee.  How is paying college athletes any different?  There are a lot of similarities to the two ideas, think about them.



Bail em' out boys!

Then there is the overall attitude of the game.  Watch a college game on Saturdays and study the players and the coaches.  Then watch it on Sunday and do the same thing.  They are NOT the same.  The players on Saturday, play with a passion and aggression that is unparalleled in Pro Football.  This is even more evident in the argument between College Basketball and Pro Basketball.  At least in the collegiate game, they play defense.  Pro Basketball is nothing more than "Look at me, I get millions to play street ball".  I can't stand professional sports, because at the end of the day, the athlete gets paid, so winning and performing at the best of one's ability takes a backseat to Bentley's and Benjamin's.  I would advocate a performance based payment system for professional athletes, if I had my way (In Dueceland) where like most of us, if we don't do our job, we don't get paid.  So that defensive tackle who got blown out of the B gap on the goal line for a touchdown, doesn't get paid for his screw up.  I think you'd see the face of the game change a bit.  I know, I'm sick, I need help, and the game will only be played this way in Dueceland, but hey, that's what dreams are for.



Wonder how he did today?

In summary, if you pay college athletes, you destroy the game.  I do think there could be a happy medium here, but in all likeliness, it won't be anywhere near this.  I wonder if we will have college lockouts if they institute a "pay to play" system?  I think the advancement of the game, should be left on the field and in the coach's office, not in the pocket book of the players.  Remember, nobody made them sign that scholarship....

I don't normally have posts like this, but something sorta snapped this morning when reading Smart Football's article after reading what a joke of a deal our lawmakers struck over the weekend on the nation's debt.  That with the mounting fact that Washington D.C. could float into the Atlantic and I wouldn't give a shit, got me to typing.  I will try to stay away from posts like these in the future, and I kinda feel like Jerry McGuire when he wrote his mission statement.  Hopefully I don't run off too many people by writing an opinion post.



In other news, Smart Football has a great post about a man few understand.  Mike Leach's book, Swing Your Sword has created waves among coaches and there is a great article about it that can be found here.  Good article on what appears to be something I'm adding to my birthday wish list!  Leach was and is a great innovator of the game, I have heard nothing but good reviews about this book and look forward to reading it.



Brophy has a good post on Unbreakable Fire Zones.  Manny Diaz's concepts are growing in popularity, as can be seen in this post from Coach Hoover.  Two very good reads if you are into FZ concepts and keeping things simple and adjustable.  Good job guys!

Coach Hoover's latest post is one of the best blog reads I've had in a while.  It is a very in-depth article on something known as the Peter Principle.  After reading this, I can finally rank myself in the victim column of just such a principle.  Now I know why I can't stand stupid people!  Anyhow, a great read by a great mind in football, good job Coach Hoover.


Over at The 3 Back Option Football Spot is a great link to Coach Iannuci's quarterback manual.  A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away I bought this manual, and I can tell you READ IT!  I only thought I understood the option quarterback.  This manual will aid you in not only teaching your option quarterback, but developing him to be the "dealer" on the field you need him to be.  Please check out Coach Iannuci's blog, if you are triple option guy like me, you'll LOVE IT.



In other words...when Moby Dick was a minnow!

If you haven't checked out Gridnotes, you are missing out.  With so many bloggers out there, information can become hard to find.  Check out Gridnotes and get a summarized view of each article along with links to the full article, as well as categorized links to aid in finding just the right tidbit of information you are looking for.  It's in my favorites, what are you waiting for???

Lastly, Coach Hoover had a link to Becoming a Man for All Seasons, which is yet another very informative blog I think you should read.  Very good reads on a wide variety of topic, from the technical to the theoretical and even motivational. 

Still waiting to hear if I'm going to be a DC for a local junior high or not.  Don't know how to feel about it, as once again I'm helping a friend and that didn't get me too far the first time.  Anyhow, I guess it's coaching though right.  Season is upon us, free agency is maddening and we are going to have an NFL season after all.  Hang in there boys, football's right around the corner!



I'm ready for football dammit!!!!

Duece